There’s been a Who-fest in our house for the last few weeks. As the launch of the new Doctor series approached, we decided to do our own bit of time-travelling, for a reminder of what happened in 2005, when Christopher Eccleston re-booted the series. We didn’t plan to watch the whole story, but apart from one or two episodes that we couldn’t access, we’ve kept going and were roughly at the halfway point of Peter Capaldi’s term of office, when the new series began to broadcast.
Watching both has been beneficial. I’ve enjoyed the contrast of the Jodie Whittaker version.
It takes time for us to know each new regeneration. First we get used to the face, accent and clothes, then the personality begins to refine. Meanwhile, the journey through time and space continues.
Where do we find The Doctor, doer of good deeds, protector of the universe?
In the prologue to the ninth series, Ohila, leader of the sisterhood says, ‘Right behind you and one step ahead.’
There’s nothing like a good paradox to add layers to what is really a fairly simple and even familiar format. A community is in crisis, threatened by tyrannising outsiders. One or two try to take a stand against them, but are overcome. Things are looking grim, until a stranger enters the scene. We’ve met such heroes before. That’s no surprise. Stories are continually being regenerated.
One of the forerunners I see for The Doctor is a re-imagining of the pioneer-days of the western United States. I’m talking about, The Lone Ranger, who despite his name, always had two trusty side-kicks, Tonto, his native American friend and Silver, his horse.
The Doctor mostly travels with a loyal companion (or sometimes several), in a surprisingly wise and knowing Tardis, but there is another reason for my choosing this source rather than Shane, for instance. Often, as The Lone Ranger rode off into the sunset, one character would ask another, ‘Who was that masked man?’
The Doctor’s true name is a secret, so invariably in new situations the introductions are:
‘Hello, I’m The Doctor.
To which, the pedantically inclined reply, ‘Dr Who?’
They might also say, Dr Why? Where? When? or How?
The twelfth doctor says, ‘I try never to understand, it’s called an open mind.’ I liked the twelfth doctor, particularly in the Steven Moffat stories. And more particularly, the ninth series, when the character interactions seemed to jell perfectly. There was something special happening in the interactions between The Doctor, Clara Oswald and Missy that seems, in retrospect, to have anticipated this recent regeneration.
Watch this new series carefully, and what becomes apparent is how much of the old Doctors are being referenced. The key themes are still there, (what is the nature of friendship, of guilt, of love?) though maybe the interpretation is getting a little shaken up. I’m looking forward to finding out Who this latest Doctor really is.
Love this series and discovered it well after it started which meant I too binged on it for hours a day. My nerdy son introduced me while visiting from his Army base and it became our preferred activity. I didn’t like the last Doctor. He was too tentative so I’m looking forward to this regeneration.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s certainly not tentative.
LikeLike
Seems I missed a lot of fun. I humbly admit, I’ve yet to see any of the series 🙂 One day …
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s one of my indulgences, though I know this kind of science fantasy is not to everyone’s taste…
LikeLike
I love that the concept of Dr. Who just keeps on going!👏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too.
LikeLike
I’ve been watching the new doctor for a few weeks now but I’m not sure it’s really working for me, it’s a sort of 21st century politically correct version of an old si-fi concept. A female Doctor Who? Why not have a female James Bond or a female Sherlock Holmes? I don’t think so!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do think they sometimes take time to ‘bed-in’. I seem to remember that when Peter Capaldi took over there were a lot of worries from faithful fans who’d grown used to watching much younger men. Ultimately he worked out so well, that for many of us, he became a (maybe ‘the’) favourite.
I agree, that when it comes to James Bond or Sherlock Holmes it would be a hard sell to switch genders, but I can’t think of a reason for wanting to. The role of detective or spy is simple to re-interpret. A time traveller, though, that’s something individual. I’ve big hopes for this one, and I think success depends as much on the new writers as it does the actor. I wonder what the general consensus is, I haven’t had time to look around social media lately.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I see your point, a few more episodes and the new Doctor will be much more familiar and we’ll be tuned in to the new look of the show. Tom Baker circa 1980 was my favourite Doctor but things have moved on since then . . .
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes, that voice. I don’t think anyone’s matched him for identifiability (is that a word?) in quite the same way. I rather liked Sylvester MacCoy. In fact, I’m not sure there’s been a doctor I didn’t like. Not sure if that’s good or bad. Ah but, there were some side-kicks i found incredibly annoying…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with you there Cath, there’s not been a Doctor I haven’t liked although I was slow to warm to Sylvester McCoy and as much as I liked Colin Baker I hated his outfit!
LikeLiked by 1 person